| 
|
Statement
to the 47th United Nations
Commission on the Status of Women
On Violence, Media and ICTs
March 5, 2003
Delivered
by Gertrude Eigelsreiter-Jashari
WIDE-Austria
The CSW
is discussing follow-up to the Beijing Platform for Action in the areas
of media, information technology, violence and women's human rights. We
believe it is not possible to explore these themes without an integrated
analysis of how different groups of women are impacted in multiple aspects
of their lives. An integrated analysis helps in understanding the existing
economic system, which re-enforces gender, racial, ethnic and class inequalities;
violence and the denial of human rights. Such an analysis allows us to
explore power relations at all levels and the differential impact on particular
groups of women. It allows us to see how media impacts violence, and violence
shapes media.
The global
economic order and current macro-economic policies, transmitted through
international financial and trade institution, transnational corporations
and the interests of powerful nations, shape a dominant media message
and exacerbate violence. Economic violence is a significant aspect of
violence against women. This is seen in the overall impact of neo-liberal
economic policies-from privatization, to the loss of food sovereignty,
to the imposition of trade rules that would deny accessible HIV/AIDS drugs
or any independent development path. It is seen in employment practices;
violence and sexual harassment in the workplace; lack of access to basic
services; unemployment and precarious jobs; trafficking and economic prostitution;
economic immigration and displacement; and war. These realities are often
reflected through distorted media images, or ignored by the media altogether.
Media is used to maintain particular privileges and power. It helps to
legitimize current unequal economic, political and social relations by
creating images, casting blame on particular groups, and framing a single
consumerist world view that justifies economic inequality and war.
We echo
the remarks of Feride Acar, Chair of CEDAW, who noted yesterday that "discrimination
is multi-faceted and complex and that few individuals are affected by
only one form of discrimination." We underline the importance of using
an intersectional perspective as affirmed during the 45th session of the
CSW when it addressed the intersection of gender, race, ethnicity and
other oppressions. There is no generic "woman" as the target of our policy.
This means that an analysis of media or ICTs must explore the realities
of different groups of women and the racial as well as gender hierarchies
in terms of work, access and images. An analysis of violence is more than
inter-personal conflict or the issue of trafficking. It includes state
violence, the violence of war and the violence of an economic system that
has intensified poverty. This violence has often been directed at women
of particular racial and ethnic groups within nations and within situations
of conflict.
The CSW's
agreed conclusions should prioritize measures to address the multiple
discrimination that women experience in the context of media, ICTs and
violence. These are deeply linked with global economic inequalities. Poor
women in racial and ethnically marginalized groups need to become visible
in both the analysis and in your policy recommendations.
As an example,
action on communications and media must address the diversity of women's
cultures and realities and cannot be limited to digital solutions. We
echo the concerns of the Women's Caucus of the World Summit on Information
Society, which states that measures of progress cannot only be related
to digital technology. Appropriate technology, community radio, access
to electricity, telephones and other means of communication must be considered.
The agreed
conclusions should consider women, media, ICTs and violence in the context
of economic policies that produce unequal conditions and abusive situations.
We affirm the recommendation from the Report of the Secretary General
on violence (E/CN.6/2003/7), to review and reorient from a gender perspective
macroeconomic, trade and social sector policies to ensure that they do
not exacerbate feminized poverty and gender-based inequalities. An enabling
economic environment is essential to progress on gender, racial and ethnic
equality.
|