|
WOMEN'S
INTERNATIONAL COALITION FOR ECONOMIC JUSTICE (WICEJ) STATEMENT
World
Social Forum III, Porto Alegre, Brazil
January 2003
Critical
Moments, Signs of Resistance
and Evolving Strategies
Get
PDF version
Global women's movements
are at a new political moment. This is a context that challenges us to
evaluate our analysis and strategies. As a people-centered, gender aware,
sustainable and equitable development agenda is sidelined by the neo-liberal
corporate agenda, women have increased their presence in new international
arenas. These include monitoring the World Bank, International Monetary
Fund (IMF) and World Trade Organization (WTO) and regional trade blocks;
corporate campaigns; as well as support for the World Social Forum.
The Women's International
Coalition for Economic Justice (WICEJ) is a space that links women's organizations
and builds relationships between the issues of women's rights, women's
economic justice, women's multiple discrimination and a peace and security.
WICEJ is assessing new strategic venues for action, and ways for women
to collaborate across venues to advance economic justice and all women's
human rights. We are working to build bridges among feminists and women's
groups who organize around health, violence and reproductive rights, and
those who organize around development, macro-economic policy, and economic
justice; bridges across regions of the world; bridges among women in trade
unions and women's NGOs; and bridges across lines of race, ethnicity,
caste, class and sexual orientation.
We see the emergence
of a diverse movement for global justice, represented in the World Social
Forum, as a sign of hope, resistance and alternatives in this time of
crisis. We recognize the ways in which social movements have drawn on
women's vision and organizing experience. We have been concerned about
women's marginalization within social movements. We welcome advances in
feminist leadership in the third World Social Forum and urge that this
be strengthened at the international, regional and local levels of the
Forum, to strengthen the Forum process as a whole. There are key events
and developments that shape this current moment:
Rise of Fundamentalisms
Women are being hemmed
in by two forces: One is the push for a corporate-led globalization with
a "fundamentalist" notion that there is only one economic model for the
world, that of the "free market" and trade liberalization. The other is
that of religious and ethnic fundamentalism, aggravated in part from the
dislocation caused by neo-liberalism. Both of these forces are devastating
to women, who suffer both the loss of livelihoods and economic security,
and the efforts to reassert control over their life choices and their
bodies.
Neo-liberal globalisation
creates fertile recruiting grounds for conservative religious or ethnic
"fundamentalist" movements and groups in many parts of the world. Fundamentalists
have gained the support of some Southern populations, alienated by the
failure of states to meet basic rights and the imposition of a hegemonic
culture by actors that dominate the global economy. The loss of livelihoods
in both industrial and agricultural sectors due to trade liberalization
and export-oriented policies have increased informal work and undermined
employment security, also fueling fundamentalisms. These movements have
an explicit anti-woman agenda. Yet they are often the strongest voices
against globalization, because for them it means a loss of political,
economic and cultural control. In many cases in the North, people's sense
of economic insecurity has fed a fundamentalist right-wing that is racist,
xenophobic, and seeks to control women's lives.
Through certain governments,
groups from both North and South have made alliance in the UN to roll
back women's rights. Both internationally and nationally, these forces
are pushing hard to dismantle women's hard-won rights to define a sexual
rights and reproductive agenda, to express their sexual and reproductive
rights, and to have access to resources that assure life choices leading
to reproductive health and well-being. Increasingly, corporate globalization
and fundamentalisms are leaving deep marks on women's reproductive and
productive bodies in a shifting "body politics" that commodifies and controls
women's bodies.
Militarism and the"War
on Terrorism"
We adamantly call
for peace and reject a US war against Iraq or other targets. Both the
attacks on US targets on September 11, 2001 and the US response are extreme
representations of patriarchy. The US bombing of Afghanistan, threats
against Iraq and North Korea, and the spread of war and militarism in
all regions of the world-from Colombia and the Middle East to Pakistan,
India and the Philippines-represent US unilateralism and the effort to
maintain hegemony and control over resources. Systemic militarism and
the drive for war build a culture of aggression and violence that restricts
rights and exposes women and girls to rape, displacement, migration and
violence. The killing of women and children is hidden behind terms like
"collateral damage." Efforts by the US Administration to wage war in the
name of defending "women's rights" has confused many women, particularly
within the US. In many nations "Anti-terrorism" has become an excuse to
stifle dissent and the political space to demand the fulfillment of rights
and equality. Resources are further diverted from basic needs including
food, health, education and welfare to the military and "national security"
apparatus. We call on nations to follow the bold action taken this month
by Brazilian President Luis Ignacio "Lula" da Silva to cancel certain
military contracts and direct resources to addressing social demands and
poverty in that nation.
The World Trade Organization
The results of the
November 2001 Doha Ministerial meeting, which ignored the frequently-expressed
concerns of developing countries, demonstrated the determination of the
industrialized countries to pursue their agenda of trade liberalization.
This agenda largely benefits multinational corporations and both northern
and southern ruling elites at the expense of people, particularly poor
and discriminated groups, everywhere. The expansion of issues covered
by trade and investment is an extreme representation of capitalism in
its most exploitative form, reflecting the control that transnational
corporations hold over all governments, jeopardizing national sovereignty
and democratic participation. This agenda is built on the exploitation
of women's time, labor and sexuality and undermines the agreed human rights
conventions and a human rights approach to development. Neoliberal economics
has eroded the concept of a living wage in favor of "market determination"
that translates into acute exploitation. The push for privatization of
essential services has had a particularly negative impact on women, both
as consumers and workers. The 2003 Cancun Ministerial meeting must not
be allowed to further advance this dangerous agenda.
Racism
As a result of UN
World Conference Against Racism (WCAR, 2001) women came to a deeper understanding
of the ways in which racism is embedded in the prevailing economic structure
and is interlinked with gender oppression. Women began to shape strategies
to change attitudes, behaviors and prejudices in order to transform social
and gender relations. The Conference also exposed the unwillingness of
former colonial and neo-colonial powers to take responsibility for historic
acts of exploitation and repression. New commitments to addressing women's
multiple oppressions emerging from the WCAR are all the more critical
now, in a time of increased racial, ethnic and xenophobic hatred fed by
militarism, fundamentalisms, and neo-liberalism.
United Nations (UN)
Conferences and processes
Some UN member states
have placed the credibility of the UN in jeopardy by seeking to reverse
the commitments made at world conferences, particularly regarding issues
of social justice and equality. The 5-year review processes revealed the
extent to which fundamentalist forces fought to reverse hard-won gains
on women's rights and social development. The outcomes of the Financing
for Development and World Summit for Sustainable Development conferences,
with their emphasis on public/private partnerships rather than government
accountability, represent a triumph of the neo-liberal agenda and an abandonment
by UN member states of their commitment to development, to peace and to
environmental protection. The Rome Statute of the ICC, which entered into
force on 1 July 2002 and has special significance for women, is already
being jeopardized by intensive political and economic pressure by the
U.S. UN inter-governmental outcomes are increasingly identified with the
"coherence" between policy frameworks of the World Bank, the IMF and the
WTO rather than "coherence" with the needs of women and their communities,
undermining the ability of governments to act in the interests of their
citizens. Despite all this, the UN remains the best potential for a democratic
space at the international level and we commit ourselves to holding the
UN accountable to its best ideals.
Evolving strategies
The women's movement
should inject a feminist perspective into global movements for social
change as we create alternatives to the neo-liberal agenda. This means
deepening our own analysis and alternatives from the perspective of multiple
oppressions, and increasing our leadership role within global justice
movements, particularly the World Social Forum. This entails a dual strategy
of organizing in women-only spaces, and seeking to integrate a gender/race
perspective into mixed forums. Together, we must take our agenda into
multiple international arenas rather than having our agenda set by institutions
such as the WTO, the IMF, the World Bank and the United Nations. In this
context our vision and strategies must pay more attention to:
* the incorporation
of a sharper focus on the intersection of race, class, gender and international
relations in our analysis;
* intentionally building
women's movements committed to social justice and peace, with active participation
in opposing wars and militarism that impose and extend imperial domination;
* using participatory
methodologies for movement-building that draw on women's experiences;
* engaging youth
in decision-making processes for movement building;
* defining women's
perspectives on the meaning of human security and the quality of life;
We seek to explore
new venues and partnerships; we continue to build alternatives to current
economic and social models in a focus on national and multi-lateral accountability;
to resist war and fundamentalisms; and to model in our relationships and
our advocacy our desired outcomes for justice.
|